For most people, Covid-19 causes only mild or moderate symptoms, such as fever and cough.

If for most people who only have mild or moderate symptoms why can't we just let the doctor and the patient decide what is the best way to treat Covid-19 in their body?

The big topic today is hydroxychloroquine.                           So what is this drug? Well it have been prescribed for years to help patients with these debilitating, or even deadly, diseases, and FDA has determined that these drugs are safe and effective when used for these diseases in accordance with their FDA-approved labeling.

So can a doctor use this for other treatment besides the ones that are approved for by the FDA? YES!

FDA approved products may be prescribed by physicians for off-label uses if they determine it is appropriate for treating their patients, including during COVID.

So who is stopping the use of this drug, Politicians. 

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) revoked the emergency use authorization (EUA) that allowed for chloroquine phosphate and hydroxychloroquine sulfate to be used to treat certain hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Who is the commissioner of the FDA? Stephen Michael Hahn an American physician who is the Commissioner of Food and Drugs since December 2019. Before becoming Commissioner, he was a radiation oncologist serving as Chief Medical Executive of the MD Anderson Cancer Center.

So it's a Radiation oncologist telling front line doctors, treating Covid-19, what to use? No he is just the puppet for the DC swamp. We allow pregnant women to make the best decision for their bodies between them and their doctor.

But those with Covid-19 are making their decision between themselves and the Politicians.

Covid-19 virus

Unplanned movie what is hollywood and the left afraid of ?

If you haven’t seen a commercial for Unplanned, an anti-abortion movie critical of Planned Parenthood, it isn’t for lack of trying on the part of marketers, whose efforts have been consistently rebuffed by TV networks.
 Marketing Unplanned has been an uphill battle for a few months now, since the MPAA saddled the film with an R rating, which filmmakers say will chase away a key demographic: Christians. Indeed, Up TV cited the R rating when it also rejected the commercial, as did several Christian radio channels that also refused to air ads for Unplanned.

 Johnson, 38, is a pro-life activist who previously worked as one of the youngest Planned Parenthood employees ever to earn the title of clinic director. She released her Unplanned memoir in October 2011 after resigning from her position in October 2009. Johnson, who says she helped orchestrate 22,000 abortions before leaving Planned Parenthood, claimed to have quit after seeing an abortion take place on an ultrasound.

 The abortion doctor explains that he needs to perform an “ultrasound-guided procedure” and wants Abby to “hold probe” on the ultrasound. While he makes preparations for the abortion, Abby sets up the ultrasound and suddenly we hear a heartbeat and see a 13-week-old baby on the monitor. The girl receiving the abortion begins to panic, as the abortion doctor yells at her to “hold still!” The nurse holds her down, coldly lecturing her, “You want it done, don’t you?”

At this point, the abortion doctor begins to place a catheter in the girl’s cervix to perform a suction D&C abortion. As we can clearly see on the monitor, the baby reacts viscerally to what is taking place: “It just moved away from the catheter,” Abby says, stunned.

 “They always move. That’s why I do it this way!” the doctor snaps back.

Trump’s approval rating among black voters at record high as Democrats try to keep blacks on the plantation

President Donald Trump’s approval rating among black voters is at a record high, according to the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll.

President Trump’s approval rating among blacks stood at 40% in a Rasmussen poll two days before Halloween. Rasmussen surveys are often friendlier to the president than those of other polling organizations, so critics are quick to dismiss them as outliers. In this instance, however, that could be a mistake.

 Voters feel young black Americans are better off under President Trump than they were under Barack Obama, the nation’s first black president.

 Since Donald Trump officially declared himself a candidate for the presidency of the United States in 2015, there has been a constant drumbeat of allegations coming from Democrats and certain members of the media claiming that the former tycoon and businessman is a dyed-in-the-wool racist,

This is being done to keep blacks on the Democrat plantation and keep them voting for Democrats. The play from their playbook is to convince Blacks and Latinos that President Donald Trump is a racist and keep their vote under the Democrat tent.

Here are some samples from the play book.

Michael Cohen, the convicted liar and disbarred former lawyer to President Donald Trump, will accuse Trump of being a “racist,”

 Former President Obama suggested that President Trump is not solving the world’s problems because he has “racism” and “mommy issues.”

 Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) stated that President Trump can begin to prove he’s not racist or bigoted by supporting the bipartisan immigration compromise.

 MSNBC’s “Deadline,” network host Al Sharpton said President Donald Trump is a racist obsessed with race.

At a Martin Luther King Jr. celebration in Columbia, SC, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) said President Donald Trump was “a racist.”

Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton said President Donald Trump “has been racist, he’s been sexist. He’s been Islamophobic. He has been anti-LQBTQ.”

 CNN host Don Lemon wondered why so many of President Donald Trump’s supporters overlook his “racism”

Sunday on ABC’s “This Week,” Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH) said President Donald Trump’s “phony” populism was anti-Semitic and racist.

 Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) claimed  there is “no question” that President Donald Trump is a “racist.”


CBS’s “The Late Show,” during his monologue, host Stephen Colbert said President Donald Trump was a “horny old racist

 CNN’s “Newsroom,” Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-NY) said President Donald Trump was unleashing racism in America.

Donald Trump was never accused of racism before he ran for president in 2016.

If you look hard you can see what the Democrats are up to. Remember it's your vote! Vote the way you want not the way someone else wants you to.

Hillary Clinton suggested that voter suppression in Wisconsin contributed to her 2016 election defeat

Hillary Clinton has told a crowd in a historic black church in Selma Alabama, that the absence of the Voting Rights Act contributed to her 2016 defeat to Donald Trump.

 Hillary stated, “I was the first person who ran for president without the protection of the Voting Rights Act, “I’ll tell you, it makes a really big difference. And it doesn’t just make a difference in Alabama and Georgia. It made a difference in Wisconsin, where the best studies that have been done said somewhere between 40,000 and 80,000 people were turned away from the polls because of the color of their skin, because of their age, because of whatever excuse could be made up to stop a fellow American citizen from voting.”

In Hillary Clinton book, What Happened, she wrote  “In Wisconsin, where I lost by just 22,748 votes, a study from Priorities USA estimated that the new voter ID law helped reduce turnout by 200,000 votes, primarily from low-income and minority areas,”

 Priorities USA is a left-wing organization, which backed President Obama, and Clinton and says that  "the voter ID requirement undoubtedly prevented or discouraged some people from voting. But the report did not attributes all of the decrease in turnout to the ID law, when there are many other reasons that could also explain it, including a lack of enthusiasm for Clinton or Trump, or perhaps a belief that Trump couldn’t win Wisconsin."

 While Politifact cites experts who say that voter ID laws may have reduced turnout, it is far from certain how many people this affected.

 A host of establishment media outlets were declaring victory for Hillary Clinton weeks before the U.S. presidential election.

NPR stated, 
Let's make one thing clear: Three weeks out from this election, Hillary Clinton is winning — and it's not close. Yes, people still have to vote, but if Democratic groups come out — and the Trump scorched-earth campaign is more like a white flag than an actual strategy — Hillary Clinton will be the next president of the United State.

 The latest NPR Battleground Map shows that while Trump's path was always been narrow, now it's nearly nonexistent. The only places where the map has really expanded amid Trump's controversies is into Republican territory.

This type of reporting is voter suppression which was done by all the national media.

Many Latino migrants are being raped by the cartel-affiliated coyotes

The New York Times has admitted that many Latino migrants are being raped by the cartel-affiliated coyotes who traffick them to jobs in Democratic-run cities.

 The stories are many, and yet all too similar. Undocumented women making their way into American border towns have been beaten for disobeying smugglers, impregnated by strangers, coerced into prostitution, shackled to beds and trees and — in at least a handful of cases — bound with duct tape, rope or handcuffs.

 For weeks, a 36-year-old mother of three, was in a locked room, the cartel-affiliated coyotes she had paid to get her safely to the United States drugged her with pills and cocaine, refusing to let her out even to bathe.

The huge scale of rape is exactly why it is immoral for us to continue with these catch-and-release policies which encourage people to make this dangerous journey.

Those policies are protected by Democrats and by GOP groups, each of which has their own incentive to encourage the migration of workers. 

President Trump has used the threat faced by migrant women to make his case for a border wall. “One in three women are sexually assaulted on the dangerous trek up through Mexico,” he said in January — an estimate that appears to have originated from some limited surveys, one of them by Doctors Without Borders, of women traveling through Mexico.

 Rape of migrants is so common that some women and girls plan for it, taking or bringing contraception, or they may be required to take it by smugglers^. A PBS NewsHour story about sexual assault of female migrants interviewed a pharmacist in Altar in Sonora, who said that the town is one of the last stops for someone about to cross the border, and that in the pharmacy she frequently receives the same question: "What can I do in case I'm raped, and I don't want to get pregnant.

 Cases of abuses are rarely reported or prosecuted, and data about these crimes is difficult to acquire or assess The newspaper La Jornada surveyed women attempting to migrate while they were in Mexican border cities. 30% said coyotes forced them to have sex as payment. Because many of the offenses involve people in power or connected to organized crime, many women also fear retaliation for speaking up

Britain will open Europe’s first transgender prison

Britain will open Europe’s first transgender prison wing this week, after sexual assaults at women’s jails by male inmates who ‘identified’ as female and are incarcerated with women.

 The wing, within a women's prison in south London, will initially cater for three offenders who were born male but have since changed gender.

 Officials say the three prisoners, who have Gender Recognition Certificates, will not have access to the other women at HMP Downview, in Sutton.

 The Gender Recognition Act 2004 enables transsexual people to apply to receive a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC). A Gender Recognition Certificate is the document issued that shows that a person has satisfied the criteria for legal recognition in the acquired gender.

  The chief executive of the Howard League for Penal Reform, said vulnerable women were being put at risk by a small number of violent men whose primary interest was harming women.

  During a recent prison visit a governor told her of five prisoners who were identifying as women and had asked for transfer. All had a history of sexual violence against women and had had their requests turned down. 

 “In my view, any man who has committed a serious sexual or violent offense against women, still has a penis and still has male hormones, should not be put into a women’s prison. There is a case for having separate provision; that is a debate to be had.”

state-of-the-art electric bus unable to hold enough of a charge to function.

The city of Albuquerque, New Mexico, spent $133 million on a state-of-the-art electric bus system only to see it go bust.

 

 The arrangement for 15 electric buses slated for the city’s transit fleet is being cancelled after staff cited brake failures and other equipment malfunctions during training and testing, according to Mayor Tim Keller.

 “When we started running the buses on test runs, we found major problems with the battery range, the brakes and some electrical issues,” Keller said. “They seem to be things that were already on the ‘to be fixed list,’ but they started getting worse.

 “No one will make an electric bus to our specifications because they say it’s not possible,” Keller said. “No other company will do it. There’s no option for electric. We’ll go with a version of clean diesel or gas, then we’ll look to phase in electric once the technology catches up.”

 Since the project was shelved, the buses are sitting out of commission and the stations for the rapid transit system sit unused, inviting vandals to destroy the newly built ticket stations.

A waste of tax payers money! 

Clinton approves a plan to give North Korea nuclear

President Clinton approved a plan to arrange more than $4 billion in energy aid to North Korea during the next decade in return for a commitment from the country's hard-line Communist leadership to freeze and gradually dismantle its nuclear weapons development program. "This agreement will help achieve a longstanding and vital American objective -- an end to the threat of nuclear proliferation on the Korean Peninsula,"

 "This agreement is good for the United States, good for our allies, and good for the safety of the entire world," Mr. Clinton said in a brief appearance in the White House press room. "It's a crucial step toward drawing North Korea into the global community."

The accord calls for a consortium of nations, led by South Korea and Japan, to provide the North with two light-water nuclear reactors, designed in a manner that makes it far more difficult for the North to convert nuclear waste into atomic weapons. 

 But the agreement also allows North Korea to keep those rods for an unspecified number of years. This provision means that the potential that North Korea could break its agreements and quickly produce nuclear weapons will not disappear until the end of the decade. 

 American officials said that after some initial balking, Seoul had agreed to pay somewhat more than 50 percent of the cost of building the reactors -- the design of which will be based on a nuclear plant in Ulchin, South Korea -- and that Japan would probably pay 30 percent or more. 

  Following the collapse of this agreement in 2002, North Korea claimed that it had withdrawn from the NPT in January 2003 and once again began operating its nuclear facilities.

Words of wisdom from CNN Sep 10, 2016.

 But what happens next? And who is in a position to lay down the law to North Korea and its nuclear program? Its closest ally China is reluctant to go further than a statement of condemnation and Pyongyang is already subject to the strictest sanctions in the world. There are few options left, short of cutting off the power supplies -- in effect, turning off the lights in North Korea.

More to come,

Wagg Dogg

Chicago Mayor Emanuel All Illegal Immigrants Welcomed

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel says the city plans to sue the U.S. Department of Justice over President Donald Trump’s immigration policies, specifically over the so-called sanctuary cities program.
 Chicago is considered a sanctuary city in part because Chicago law prohibits police from providing federal ICE officials access to people who are in the Police Department's custody, unless they are wanted on a criminal warrant or have serious criminal convictions.

It also prohibits local police from allowing ICE agents to use their facilities for interviews or investigations. And it bars on-duty officers from responding to ICE inquiries or talking to ICE officials about a person's custody status or release date.

Welcoming City Ordinance
This is Chapter 2-173 of the Chicago Code, titled “Welcoming City Ordinance.” It is part of Title 2, titled “City Government And Administration.” It contains 9 laws. It’s comprised of the following 9 sections.

  Chicago protects immigrants through city ordinance, through CPD directives, and through public services. The primary mode of this protection is “non-cooperation”: the City of Chicago and its departments will not cooperate with federal authorities to arrest, detain, or deport undocumented resident.

“We are not going to be between picking our values of who we are as a welcoming city, and strengthening our police department,” Emanuel said in the interview.

 “We’re not going to actually auction off our values as a city, so Monday morning the City of Chicago is going to court; we’re going to take the Justice Department to court based on this,” he said. “We find it unlawful and unconstitutional to be, as a city, coerced on a policy."

So a city says that we find it unlawful and unconstitutional to be coerced on a policy. And Chicago thugs say that we find it unlawful and unconstitutional to be coerced on a policy not to own a gun.  Who is right? 

More to come,
Wagg Dogg

 

CNN Lies about UN Ambasssador Samantha Powers Testmony

de·ceive
(of a person) cause (someone) to believe something that is not true, typically in order to gain some personal advantage.

(CNN)Samantha Power, who served as former President Barack Obama's ambassador to the United Nations, is expected to be interviewed Friday by Senate intelligence committee investigators as part of their Russia probe, according to a source familiar with the matter.

This is how CNN deceive it's viewers by not telling the whole story or twisting the words to their benefit. Above is an article written  By Manu Raju, making the reader believe that Samantha Power is to be interviewed. Nice word but she was subpoenaed or forced to testify. Second CNN says about the Russia probe make their audance believe it's all about President Trump.

To find out the truth we must go to the Washington Times. The possibility the Obama White House spied on Trump and campaign personnel.


(The Washington Times) 
Former United Nations Ambassador Samantha Power will become the latest Obama-era official to meet with congressional investigators probing a vastly different side of the Russian election meddling story, the possibility the previous White House spied on Trump campaign and transition personnel, when she gives private testimony Friday before a congressional panel.

And again CNN deceives it's audience by twisting their words and printing investigate and address Russia's interference.

(CNN) "Ambassador Power strongly supports any bipartisan effort to investigate and address Russia's interference in our electoral process and she wanted to engage both the House and Senate Committees charged with investigating it," Pressman said. "Long before receiving an invitation to engage the congressional committees, Ambassador Power stressed the importance of determining the full extent of this threat to our national security and learning lessons from what has happened."

There is one thing that I do agree with Ambassador Powers
the importance of determining the full extent of this threat to our national security. The Obama White House looks increasingly to have committed a crime by using U.S. intelligence for political purposes. This is why Samantha went to Washington. To testify about her roll in unmasking hundreds of US citizens.

More to come!
Wagg Dogg

Trump bounces back in latest poll

Trump jumped from 35 percent Friday to 39 percent Sunday, while Clinton fell from 45 to 44 over the same period. 
 Clinton had opened a 10-point gap at the end of last week, but her margin was back to 44-39 to start the week. The numbers show only a 1-point post-debate uptick for Clinton, who led Trump 43-39 the day of the showdown.

Despite a horrendous week, which began with an much-panned debate performance and ended with a feud with a beauty queen and new questions about his income taxes, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has pulled back within 5 percentage points of Democrat Hillary Clinton in the latest tracking data from The Times-Picayune/Lucid presidential poll released Monday (Oct. 3).

 The poll has been in the field since Aug. 1, asking the same questions each day and reflect swings based on daily news and events. The trendline since the candidates Sept. 26 debate, however, shows only a slight uptick for Clinton, who was widely seen as "winning" the high-profile televised showdown.

 Among the third-party candidates, Libertarian Gary Johnson dropped from 9 points to 6 points over the course of the week. Green Party nominee Jill Stein remained at 2 points. The number of undecided voters was 10 percent.

 Don't look at just the numbers look at the direction the candidates are going.

By  Tim Morris, NOLA.com|The Times-Picayune

• Email the author
• Follow on Twitter 

 

Bill and Hillary Clinton get paid a lot of money to talk.

The Democratic power couple earned just over $6.7 million in speaking fees last year, according to their 2015 tax returns.


 Hillary clearly dialed back her paid speaking activity last year. She earned only $1.5 million. That's way down from the $10.5 million she garnered from speaking fees in 2014 and the $9.7 million she made in 2013.

 The Clintons are millionaires, thanks to big businesses paying them sizable sums to speak at corporate events. It's a great way to make money, but it also comes with questions about whether the Clintons are too tied to corporate cash. 


The 2015 tax documents from the Clintons don't specify which businesses paid Bill and Hillary to speak. In the past, Wall Street has frequently paid Hillary to speak. Bernie Sanders, her democratic rival for the presidential nomination, challenged her to release video or text of the speeches she gave to big business. She never did.

"Nothing will change until we elect candidates who reject Wall Street money," a Sanders ad said, directly hitting Clinton.

 The Hillary Clinton net worth total of $31.3 million comes from analyzing her Public Financial Disclosure Reports. Bill Clinton has an estimated net worth of $80 million. That gives a combined Bill and Hillary Clinton net worth of $111 million dollars.

 Barack Obama’s net worth is $3.4 million. The Obama net worth sum comes from his required personal financial disclosures, plus his $400,000 salary as U.S. President.

 Combined Bill and Hillary Clinton net worth 2002: $4,077,000

Barack, how can you increase you net worth?  Just ask the Clintons.

Hillary Clinton do you remember Scooter Libby?

Libby is the highest-ranking White House official convicted in a government scandal since John Poindexter, the national security adviser to President Ronald Reagan in the Iran–Contra affair





In October 2005, Libby was indicted by a federal grand jury concerning the investigation of the leak of the covert identity of Central Intelligence Agency officer Valerie Plame Wilson. Plame's position at the CIA was considered classified information. Libby was indicted on five counts relating to the Plame affair: Two counts of perjury, two counts of making false statements to federal investigators, and one count of obstruction of justice. Libby resigned all three government positions immediately after the indictment was announced.

 In the subsequent federal trial, United States v. Libby, the jury convicted Libby on four of the five counts in the indictment (one count of obstruction of justice, two counts of perjury, and one count of making false statements) and acquitted on the second count of making false statements. The day after his conviction in that trial, he resigned his later appointment as senior advisor at the Hudson Institute (January 1, 2006 – March 7, 2007)

 On July 2, 2007, when Libby's appeal of Walton's order failed, President Bush commuted Libby's 30-month prison sentence, leaving the other parts of his sentence intact. In commuting Libby's prison term, Bush stated: "I am commuting the portion of Mr. Libby's sentence that required him to spend thirty months in prison. ... My decision to commute his prison sentence leaves in place a harsh punishment for Mr. Libby.

 Presidential candidate and New York Sen. Hillary Clinton described actions that led to Libby's conviction as part of a larger effort by the White House to silence critics of the war in Iraq.

Clinton said; "Today's decision is yet another example that this administration simply considers itself above the law," said Clinton of Bush's decision to commute Libby's sentence. "This case arose from the administration's politicization of national security intelligence and its efforts to punish those who spoke out against its policies.

"Four years into the Iraq war, Americans are still living with the consequences of this White House's efforts to quell dissent. This commutation sends the clear signal that in this Administration, cronyism and ideology trump competence and justice."

Looks like the pot is calling the kettle black.

Hillary lied to congress Martha Stewart lied to investigators.

Trump supporters a basket of deplorables half full?

Voters don't like the basket of Deplorables comment.

At a fundraiser, she suggested that as many as half of GOP rival Donald Trump's supporters belonged in what she labeled a "basket of deplorables" — that they were racist, sexist, Islamophobic and/or xenophobic. She later said she regretted saying the "half" part but stuck by the crux of her argument: that many Trump backers fit into these unpalatable categories.

 The Washington Post-ABC News survey asked people whether "it's fair or unfair to describe a large portion of Trump's supporters as prejudiced against women and minorities." More than twice as many registered voters said this approach was out of bounds (65 percent) as said it was fair game (30 percent).

 But to lump half of Trump voters together into a "basket of deplorables" and attack voters who support Trump as a class was morally wrong, factually inaccurate and politically stupid. It does not matter whether she meant 50 percent of Trump supporters, or a lower percent. A candidate should not be attacking voters who support her opponent, except for the small number of white supremacists.

This deluge of negative Clinton television ads — which I consider a basket of deplorable television ads — has been continuing for many months. It is not enough for a candidate to perpetually attack an opponent without making a clear, compelling and persuasive case about why voters support the candidate who launches the attack.

 The biggest problem in Clinton's statement is that she said "half" of Trump supporters are racists, xenophobes and otherwise bigots. Half means equal or near-equal parts. There's no data to support such a specific number.

I wonder if she is talking about the Christian half who trust in GOD and not GOVERNMENT?

Clinton’s experience is nothing to brag about

I believe that the Democratic presidential nominee, Hillary Clinton, is untrustworthy. During her tenure as secretary of State she:



Accepted the obligations contained in the Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement.

Received a security indoctrination concerning the protection of classified information (marked or unmarked) and unclassified information, including the procedures to be followed.

Acknowledged that unauthorized disclosure, unauthorized retention or negligent handling of classified information could cause damage or irreparable injury to the U.S. or could be used to advantage by foreign nations.

Agreed to return all classified materials.

Was advised that breach of the agreement may result in the termination of her security clearance and/or removal from employment.

Recognized that nothing in the agreement constitutes a waiver of the U.S. of the right to prosecute her for any violation.

 The scandalous disclosure involving Clinton’s unauthorized private email servers and thousands of messages resulted in grave concerns, denials and outright lies. The truth is that Clinton demonstrated incompetency, irresponsibility, dereliction of duty and commitment, and a violation of her pledge.

 Simon Vladovich; Oklahoma City

Remember: Trump support tumbles after convention: Gallup

In the wake of the Republican and Democratic national conventions, voters are more likely to support Hillary Clinton than Donald Trump, according to a Gallup poll released Monday Aug 1st

 While 36 percent of adults are more likely to support Trump coming out of the GOP’s four-day event, 51 percent are less likely to vote for the real estate mogul. The minus-15 net rating is the worst mark for the Republican nominee coming out of the party’s convention since Gallup began asking the question.

 Last month’s Republican convention  is the only time respondents were overall less likely to vote for the candidate who was nominated. Fifty-two percent of those surveyed said they have a less favorable view of the GOP now.

 Trump thanked “everyone for the wonderful reviews” of his speech and slammed Clinton’s “very long and very boring speech.” But Gallup’s results suggest the billionaire’s remarks were the worst-received in the past 20 years.

 Forty-four percent of respondents said Clinton’s speech accepting her historic nomination was excellent or good. Trump’s acceptance speech yielded similar results on opposite ends of the spectrum and 36 percent thought it was poor or terrible — the highest percentage since '96.

This is what was being reported the first week of August. Now

Quinnipiac University declared the race “too close to call” on Monday, as its latest national poll of likely voters found Mrs. Clinton edging Mr. Trump by a margin of 47 percent to 46 percent in a head-to-head match up.

 Priorities USA, the super PAC supporting Mrs. Clinton, unveiled a new 30-second ad calling for the “Trump Train” to be stopped in its tracks.

Remember: It's hard to stop a train!

Why Hillary Clinton Should not be President

During his 1992 campaign for the presidency, Bill Clinton was promising America, “You get two for the price of one,” indicating Hillary Clinton would act as his co-president.


After the Clintons moved into the presidential mansion, the political scandals multiplied – from use of the IRS and FBI to target political opponents to stalking and harassing subjects of Bill Clinton’s sexual advances and even attempts to loot taxpayer-funded items from the White House. Americans also witnessed capers such as Travelgate, Chinagate, Filegate, White Water and Pardongate.

 In the years since the memorable Clinton presidency, Hillary has brought America Emailgate and the Benghazi scandal, among others.

 But in 2015, America is still apparently suffering from “Clinton fatigue.” Results from a Quinnipiac poll published in April revealed between 49 and 56 percent of voters in three significant swing states – Colorado, Virginia and Iowa – believe Hillary is neither honest nor trustworthy.

When the Clintons left 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in 2001, they reportedly vandalized and looted the White House. Hillary tried to ship furniture to the Clintons’ personal home in Chappaqua, New York. The Clintons came under fire when they reportedly tried to take $190,000 in gifts and furnishings from the presidential mansion.

 During their time in the White House, the Clintons also reportedly auctioned off and sold taxpayer-financed government goods and services in exchange for political campaign contributions and personal profit. Among the items sold by the Clintons, which Judicial Watch uncovered in various lawsuits, and the media and Congress in their investigations, were: 1) seats on overseas trade missions; 2) export licenses for high technology sales to communist China and elsewhere; 3) commissionerships and judgeships; 4) rides on Air Force One; 5) overnight stays in the White House’s Lincoln Bedroom; 6) graves at Arlington Cemetery; 7) meetings with key Clinton-Gore administration leaders; and other favors.

We can not allow history to repeat itself.

No chief executive at Fortune 100 has donated to Trump

No chief executives at Fortune 100 companies have donated to Donald Trump’s presidential campaign.

 In comparison, Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton has received twice as many donations from Fortune 100 execs than President Obama did in 2012, according to the Journal. Just last month, Clinton received checks for $2,700 from Apple’s Tim Cook, American Airlines’ Doug Parker, and Nike’s  Mark Parker. Individuals are capped at donating $5,400 to a candidate.

 The Journal reports that the 11 CEOs that back Clinton have donated more than $30,000 to her campaign. The financial loss for Trump’s campaign is modest, but garnering support from top executives is often a goal for Hillary Clinton, as it gives off the impression to voters that  she is competent, especially on economic issues, according to the Journal.

 According to public records, Clinton gave 92 speeches between 2013 and 2015. Her standard fee is $225,000, and she collected $21.6 million dollars in just under two years. Clinton made 8 speeches to big banks, netting $1.8 million, according to a CNN analysis.

 There is nothing illegal or unethical about former Secretaries of State earning money on the speaking circuit. The standard fee and her demands are outlined in a memo from the Harry Walker Agency in New York. According to the memo, Clinton requires travel by private jet, and even specifies that she prefers a Gulfstream 450 or larger. Her staff requires first class and business class tickets. And two members of her staff require up to three days on site to prepare, with all local transportation and meals included.

The memo states Clinton should be booked into a presidential suite with up to three separate rooms attached. Clinton also requires a flat fee of $1,000 to pay for an onsite stenographer to record everything she says. However, Clinton is not required to provide the host with a copy, according to the memo.

Costs associated with her demands are on top of her speaking fee.

Hillary Clinton Either Lied to the American People or

Hillary Clinton Either Lied to the American People or Broke the Law 

 

Hillary Clinton committed perjury. Or she looked into the faces of the American people and knowingly lied. There is no third option.

 It has become an accepted reality of this presidential campaign that Clinton spins a near-endless series of falsehoods. For months, the media has struggled with this unprecedented situation—a candidate who, unlike other politicians who stretch the truth, simply creates her own reality. Clinton regularly peddles “facts” that aren’t true, describes events that never happened or denies engaging in actions that everyone saw her do. She utters her falsehoods so fast that before reporters have the chance to correct one, she has tossed out five or six more.

 This time, it is different. Clinton can’t skip past her perfidy here. There are two records—one, a previously undisclosed deposition of the Democrat nominee testifying under oath before congress, and the second a Youtube video for the Benghazi attack. In them, Clinton tells contradictory versions of the same story with the clashing accounts tailored to provide what she wanted people to believe when she was speaking.

 No question, these two stories must be investigated if there is ever a President Clinton. In the impeachment of President Bill Clinton for lying under oath about an extramarital affair, Republicans established the standard that failing to tell the truth while testifying—even in the most understandable of circumstances—rises to the level of high crimes and misdemeanors. Surely, perjury for pecuniary purposes or to inflate one’s self-image cannot be ignored.